This function performs a \(p\)-curve analysis using a `meta`

object or calculated effect size data.

pcurve(x, effect.estimation = FALSE, N, dmin = 0, dmax = 1)

x | Either an object of class |
---|---|

effect.estimation | Logical. Should the true effect size underlying the |

N | A numeric vector of same length as the number of effect sizes included in |

dmin | If |

dmax | If |

Returns a plot and main results of the pcurve analysis:

**P-curve plot**: A plot displaying the observed \(p\)-curve and significance results for the right-skewness and flatness test.**Number of studies**: The number of studies provided for the analysis, the number of significant \(p\)-values included in the analysis, and the number of studies with \(p<0.025\) used for the half-curve tests.**Test results**: The results for the right-skewness and flatness test, including the \(p_{binomial}\) value, as well as the \(z\) and \(p\) value for the full and half-curve test.**Power Estimate**: The power estimate and 95% confidence interval.**Evidential value**: Two lines displaying if evidential value is present and/or absent/inadequate based on the results (using the guidelines by Simonsohn et al., 2015, see Details).**True effect estimate**: If`effect.estimation`

is set to`TRUE`

, the estimated true effect \(\hat{d}\) is returned additionally.

If results are saved to a variable, a list of class `pcurve`

containing the following objects is returned:

`pcurveResults`

: A data frame containing the results for the right-skewness and flatness test, including the \(p_{binomial}\) value, as well as the \(z\) and \(p\) value for the full and half-curve test.`Power`

: The power estimate and 95% confidence interval.`PlotData`

: A data frame with the data used in the \(p\)-curve plot.`Input`

: A data frame containing the provided effect sizes, calculated \(p\)-values and individual results for each included (significant) effect.`EvidencePresent`

,`EvidenceAbsent`

,`kInput`

,`kAnalyzed`

,`kp0.25`

: Further results of the \(p\)-curve analysis, including the presence/absence of evidence interpretation, and number of provided/significant/\(p<0.025\) studies.`I2`

: \(I^2\)-Heterogeneity of the studies provided as input (only when`x`

is of class`meta`

).`class.meta.object`

:`class`

of the original object provided in`x`

.

**P-curve Analysis**

\(P\)-curve analysis (Simonsohn, Simmons & Nelson, 2014, 2015) has been proposed as a method to detect \(p\)-hacking and publication bias in meta-analyses.

\(P\)-Curve assumes that publication bias is not only generated because researchers do not publish non-significant results, but also because analysts “play” around with their data ("\(p\)-hacking"; e.g., selectively removing outliers, choosing different outcomes, controlling for different variables) until a non-significant finding becomes significant (i.e., \(p<0.05\)).

The method assumes that for a specific research question, \(p\)-values smaller 0.05 of included studies should follow a right-skewed distribution if a true effect exists, even when the power in single studies was (relatively) low. Conversely, a left-skewed \(p\)-value distribution indicates the presence of \(p\)-hacking and absence of a true underlying effect. To control for "ambitious" \(p\)-hacking, \(P\)-curve also incorporates a "half-curve" test (Simonsohn, Simmons & Nelson, 2014, 2015).

Simonsohn et al. (2014) stress that \(p\)-curve analysis should only be used for test statistics which were actually of interest in the context of the included study, and that a detailed table documenting the reported results used in for the \(p\)-curve analysis should be created before communicating results (link).

**Implementation in the function**

To generate the \(p\)-curve and conduct the analysis, this function reuses parts of the *R* code underlying
the P-curve App 4.052 (Simonsohn, 2017). The effect sizes
included in the `meta`

object or `data.frame`

provided for `x`

are transformed
into \(z\)-values internally, which are then used to calculate p-values and conduct the
Stouffer and Binomial test used for the \(p\)-curve analysis. Interpretations of the function
concerning the presence or absence/inadequateness of evidential value are made according to the
guidelines described by Simonsohn, Simmons and Nelson (2015):

**Evidential value present**: The right-skewness test is significant for the half curve with \(p<0.05\)**or**the \(p\)-value of the right-skewness test is \(<0.1\) for both the half and full curve.**Evidential value absent or inadequate**: The flatness test is \(p<0.05\) for the full curve**or**the flatness test for the half curve and the binomial test are \(p<0.1\).

For effect size estimation, the `pcurve`

function implements parts of the loss function
presented in Simonsohn, Simmons and Nelson (2014b).
The function generates a loss function for candidate effect sizes \(\hat{d}\), using \(D\)-values in
a Kolmogorov-Smirnov test as the metric of fit, and the value of \(\hat{d}\) which minimizes \(D\)
as the estimated true effect.

It is of note that a lack of robustness of \(p\)-curve analysis results
has been noted for meta-analyses with substantial heterogeneity (van Aert, Wicherts, & van Assen, 2016).
Following van Aert et al., adjusted effect size estimates should only be
reported and interpreted for analyses with \(I^2\) values below 50 percent.
A warning message is therefore printed by
the `pcurve`

function when `x`

is of class `meta`

and the between-study heterogeneity
of the meta-analysis is substantial (i.e., \(I^2\) greater than 50 percent).

Harrer, M., Cuijpers, P., Furukawa, T.A, & Ebert, D. D. (2019).
*Doing Meta-Analysis in R: A Hands-on Guide*. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.2551803.
Chapter 9.2.

Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2014a). P-curve: a Key to the File-drawer.
*Journal of Experimental Psychology, 143*(2), 534.

Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D. & Simmons, J. P. (2014b). P-Curve and Effect Size:
Correcting for Publication Bias Using Only Significant Results.
*Perspectives on Psychological Science 9*(6), 666–81.

Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D. & Simmons, J. P. (2015). Better P-Curves: Making P-Curve
Analysis More Robust to Errors, Fraud, and Ambitious P-Hacking, a Reply to Ulrich and Miller (2015).
*Journal of Experimental Psychology, 144*(6), 1146-1152.

Simonsohn, U. (2017). R code for the P-Curve App 4.052. http://p-curve.com/app4/pcurve_app4.052.r (Accessed 2019-08-16).

Van Aert, R. C., Wicherts, J. M., & van Assen, M. A. (2016).
Conducting meta-analyses based on p values: Reservations and recommendations for applying
*p*-uniform and *p*-curve. *Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11*(5), 713-729.

# Example 1: Use metagen object, do not estimate d suppressPackageStartupMessages(library(meta)) data("ThirdWave") meta1 = metagen(TE,seTE, studlab=ThirdWave$Author, data=ThirdWave) pcurve(meta1)#>#> P-curve analysis #> ----------------------- #> - Total number of provided studies: k = 18 #> - Total number of p<0.05 studies included into the analysis: k = 11 (61.11%) #> - Total number of studies with p<0.025: k = 10 (55.56%) #> #> Results #> ----------------------- #> pBinomial zFull pFull zHalf pHalf #> Right-skewness test 0.006 -5.943 0.000 -4.982 0 #> Flatness test 0.975 3.260 0.999 5.158 1 #> Note: p-values of 0 or 1 correspond to p<0.001 and p>0.999, respectively. #> Power Estimate: 84% (62.7%-94.6%) #> #> Evidential value #> ----------------------- #> - Evidential value present: yes #> - Evidential value absent/inadequate: no# Example 2: Provide Ns, calculate d estimate N = c(105, 161, 60, 37, 141, 82, 97, 61, 200, 79, 124, 25, 166, 59, 201, 95, 166, 144) pcurve(meta1, effect.estimation = TRUE, N = N)#>#> P-curve analysis #> ----------------------- #> - Total number of provided studies: k = 18 #> - Total number of p<0.05 studies included into the analysis: k = 11 (61.11%) #> - Total number of studies with p<0.025: k = 10 (55.56%) #> #> Results #> ----------------------- #> pBinomial zFull pFull zHalf pHalf #> Right-skewness test 0.006 -5.943 0.000 -4.982 0 #> Flatness test 0.975 3.260 0.999 5.158 1 #> Note: p-values of 0 or 1 correspond to p<0.001 and p>0.999, respectively. #> Power Estimate: 84% (62.7%-94.6%) #> #> Evidential value #> ----------------------- #> - Evidential value present: yes #> - Evidential value absent/inadequate: no #> #> P-curve's estimate of the true effect size: d=0.484 #> #> Warning: I-squared of the meta-analysis is >= 50%, so effect size estimates are not trustworthy.# Example 3: Use metacont object, calculate d estimate data("amlodipine") meta2 <- metacont(n.amlo, mean.amlo, sqrt(var.amlo), n.plac, mean.plac, sqrt(var.plac), data=amlodipine, studlab=study, sm="SMD") N = amlodipine$n.amlo + amlodipine$n.plac pcurve(meta2, effect.estimation = TRUE, N = N, dmin = 0, dmax = 1)#>#> P-curve analysis #> ----------------------- #> - Total number of provided studies: k = 8 #> - Total number of p<0.05 studies included into the analysis: k = 4 (50%) #> - Total number of studies with p<0.025: k = 3 (37.5%) #> #> Results #> ----------------------- #> pBinomial zFull pFull zHalf pHalf #> Right-skewness test 0.312 -1.067 0.143 -1.111 0.133 #> Flatness test 0.740 -0.229 0.409 1.798 0.964 #> Note: p-values of 0 or 1 correspond to p<0.001 and p>0.999, respectively. #> Power Estimate: 25% (5%-79.1%) #> #> Evidential value #> ----------------------- #> - Evidential value present: no #> - Evidential value absent/inadequate: no #> #> P-curve's estimate of the true effect size: d=0.523# Example 4: Construct x object from scratch sim = data.frame("studlab" = c(paste("Study_", 1:18, sep = "")), "TE" = c(0.561, 0.296, 0.648, 0.362, 0.770, 0.214, 0.476, 0.459, 0.343, 0.804, 0.357, 0.476, 0.638, 0.396, 0.497, 0.384, 0.568, 0.415), "seTE" = c(0.338, 0.297, 0.264, 0.258, 0.279, 0.347, 0.271, 0.319, 0.232, 0.237, 0.385, 0.398, 0.342, 0.351, 0.296, 0.325, 0.322, 0.225)) pcurve(sim)#>#> P-curve analysis #> ----------------------- #> - Total number of provided studies: k = 18 #> - Total number of p<0.05 studies included into the analysis: k = 3 (16.67%) #> - Total number of studies with p<0.025: k = 3 (16.67%) #> #> Results #> ----------------------- #> pBinomial zFull pFull zHalf pHalf #> Right-skewness test 0.125 -2.295 0.011 -1.437 0.075 #> Flatness test 1.000 0.974 0.835 1.971 0.976 #> Note: p-values of 0 or 1 correspond to p<0.001 and p>0.999, respectively. #> Power Estimate: 68% (13%-95.5%) #> #> Evidential value #> ----------------------- #> - Evidential value present: yes #> - Evidential value absent/inadequate: no