Subgroup analysis using a mixed-effects model
subgroup.analysis.mixed.effects.Rd
This function performs a mixed-effects (random-effects model within subgroups,
fixed-effect model between subgroups) subgroup analysis using meta
objects.
Arguments
- x
An object of class
meta
, generated by themetabin
,metagen
,metacont
,metacor
,metainc
, ormetaprop
function.- subgroups
A character vector of the same length as the number of studies within the meta-analysis, with a unique code for the subgroup each study belongs to. Must have the same order as the studies in the
meta
object.- exclude
Single string or concatenated array of strings. The name(s) of the subgroup levels to be excluded from the subgroup analysis. If
"none"
(default), all subgroup levels are used for the analysis.
Value
Returns a list
with five objects:
within.subgroup.results
: The pooled effect size for each subgroup and corresponding measures of heterogeneity (Q
andI2
). If the summary measuresm
is defined as one of"RR"
,"RD"
,"OR"
,"ASD"
,"HR"
or"IRR"
in themeta
object provided inx
, the backtransformed (exponentiated) pooled effect for each subgroup effect size along with the 95% confidence interval is also provided.subgroup.analysis.results
: The results for theQ
-test for subgroup differences, its degrees of freedomdf
and p-value.m.random
: An object of classmeta
containing the results of the random-effects model applied for pooling results in each subgroup in the first step.method.tau
: The \(\tau^2\) estimator used for within-subgroup pooling (inherited from themeta
object provided inx
).k
: The total number of included studies.
Details
This function conducts a test for differences in effect sizes between subgroups of a meta-analysis. The function implements a mixed-effect model, in which the overall effect size for each subgroup is calculated using a random-effect model, and the test for subgroup differences is conducted using a fixed-effect model. The implementation follows the fixed-effects (plural) model described in Borenstein and Higgins (2013).
This model is appropriate for subgroup tests when the subgroup levels under study
are assumed to be exhaustive for the characteristic at hand, and are not randomly chosen instances
of a "population" of subgroup levels. For example, the fixed-effects (plural) model used in the function
is valid when differences between studies published before and after a certain year are considered as a
(binary) subgroup level. When subgroup levels can be assumed to be random samples from a distribution of
subgroup levels, a random-effects model is more appropriate, and may be calculated using
the update.meta
function.
The function uses the study effect sizes TE
and their standard error seTE
of the provided
meta
object to perform the subgroup analyses. Specifications of the summary measure sm
are
inherited and used to backtransform log-transformed effect sizes to their original metrics if necessary.
Results can be inspected by plugging the function output into the summary
function. Forest plots
can be generated using forest
. Additional arguments of the forest.meta
function
can be passed to the forest
function for additional styling.
References
Harrer, M., Cuijpers, P., Furukawa, T.A, & Ebert, D. D. (2019). Doing Meta-Analysis in R: A Hands-on Guide. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.2551803. Chapter 7.
Borenstein, M. & Higgins, J. P. T. (2013). Meta-Analysis and Subgroups. Prevention Science, 14 (2): 134–43.
Examples
# Example 1: Hedges' g as effect size, precalculated effect sizes
suppressPackageStartupMessages(library(dmetar))
suppressPackageStartupMessages(library(meta))
data("ThirdWave")
ThirdWave = ThirdWave[c(1,2,3,5,9,18),]
m1 <- metagen(TE = TE,
seTE = seTE,
studlab = paste(ThirdWave$Author),
data=ThirdWave,
comb.fixed = FALSE,
method.tau = "PM",
sm = "SMD")
sgame1 = subgroup.analysis.mixed.effects(x = m1, subgroups = ThirdWave$TypeControlGroup)
summary(sgame1)
#> Subgroup Results:
#> --------------
#> k SMD SE LLCI ULCI p Q I2
#> WLC 3 0.9154106 0.4253639 0.082 1.749 0.03139224728 13.058904 0.85
#> information only 3 0.4015895 0.1003796 0.205 0.598 0.00006315313 1.144426 0.00
#> I2.lower I2.upper
#> WLC 0.55 0.95
#> information only 0.00 0.90
#>
#> Test for subgroup differences (mixed/fixed-effects (plural) model):
#> --------------
#> Q df p
#> Between groups 1.382187 1 0.239729
#>
#> - Total number of studies included in subgroup analysis: 6
#> - Tau estimator used for within-group pooling: PM
# Example 2: Hedges' g as effect size, raw effect data
suppressPackageStartupMessages(library(meta))
data(amlodipine)
# Create an arbitrary subgroup for illustration purposes
amlodipine$subgroup = rep(c("A","B"),4)
m2 <- metacont(n.amlo, mean.amlo, sqrt(var.amlo),
n.plac, mean.plac, sqrt(var.plac),
data=amlodipine, studlab=amlodipine$study,
sm = "SMD")
sgame2 = subgroup.analysis.mixed.effects(x = m2, subgroups = amlodipine$subgroup)
summary(sgame2)
#> Subgroup Results:
#> --------------
#> k SMD SE LLCI ULCI p Q I2 I2.lower
#> A 4 0.4970586 0.1302176 0.242 0.752 0.0001350091 3.749695 0.20 0
#> B 4 0.3163117 0.1642004 -0.006 0.638 0.0540574677 5.330220 0.44 0
#> I2.upper
#> A 0.88
#> B 0.81
#>
#> Test for subgroup differences (mixed/fixed-effects (plural) model):
#> --------------
#> Q df p
#> Between groups 0.7438662 1 0.3884252
#>
#> - Total number of studies included in subgroup analysis: 8
#> - Tau estimator used for within-group pooling: REML
# Example 3: Risk ratio as effect size, binary outcome data, exlcude one level
suppressPackageStartupMessages(library(meta))
data(Olkin95)
# Create an arbitrary subgroup for illustration purposes
Olkin95$subgroup = c(rep(c("A","B"), 30), rep("C",10))
m3 <- metabin(event.e, n.e, event.c, n.c,
data = Olkin95, studlab = Olkin95$author,
method = "Inverse")
# Use shorthand
sgame3 = sgame(x = m3, subgroups = Olkin95$subgroup,
exclude = "B")
summary(sgame3)
#> Subgroup Results:
#> --------------
#> k TE seTE RR LLCI ULCI p Q I2
#> A 30 -0.2236279 0.06797886 0.7996126 0.700 0.914 0.0010030546 37.15381 0.22
#> C 10 -0.3378363 0.09118373 0.7133121 0.597 0.853 0.0002113859 10.65963 0.16
#> I2.lower I2.upper
#> A 0 0.50
#> C 0 0.57
#>
#> Test for subgroup differences (mixed/fixed-effects (plural) model):
#> --------------
#> Q df p
#> Between groups 1.008345 1 0.3152996
#>
#> - Total number of studies included in subgroup analysis: 40
#> - Tau estimator used for within-group pooling: REML
# Example 4: IRR as effect size, incidence data
suppressPackageStartupMessages(library(meta))
data(smoking)
# Create an arbitrary subgroup for illustration purposes
smoking$subgroup = c(rep(c("A"), 4), rep(c("B"), 3))
m4 <- metainc(d.smokers, py.smokers,
d.nonsmokers, py.nonsmokers,
data=smoking, studlab=study, sm="IRR")
sgame4 = subgroup.analysis.mixed.effects(x = m4, subgroups = smoking$subgroup)
summary(sgame4)
#> Subgroup Results:
#> --------------
#> k TE seTE IRR LLCI ULCI
#> A 4 0.5102054 0.05187149 1.665633 1.505 1.844
#> B 3 0.4921778 0.01363593 1.635875 1.593 1.680
#> p
#> A 0.00000000000000000000007881949876651557052771814897317440694091308723813955733633487919093107976209466869477182626724243164062500000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
#> B 0.00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000279883
#> Q I2 I2.lower I2.upper
#> A 42.2826988 0.93 0.85 0.97
#> B 0.6826077 0.00 0.00 0.90
#>
#> Test for subgroup differences (mixed/fixed-effects (plural) model):
#> --------------
#> Q df p
#> Between groups 0.1129792 1 0.7367775
#>
#> - Total number of studies included in subgroup analysis: 7
#> - Tau estimator used for within-group pooling: REML
if (FALSE) {
# Generate Forest Plot
# Additional arguments of the meta::forest.meta can be supplied
forest(sgame1, col.diamond = "darkgreen")
forest(sgame2)
forest(sgame3)
forest(sgame4)
}